On Fri, 1 Jun 2018, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 31.05.2018 um 19:27 schrieb Robert P. J. Day:
> > On Thu, 31 May 2018, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> >> git diff-index is "plumbing", designed for writing scripts. "git
> >> diff" on the other hand is for users and its behavior may change
> >> even if it breaks backward compatibility.
> >
> > ah, this was a philosophical underpinning i was unaware of. i
> > see occasional explanations of git porcelain versus plumbing, but
> > i don't recall anyone simply stating that the plumbing is meant to
> > have a long-term stability that is not guaranteed for the
> > porcelain.
>
> So, there you have it. ;) Plumbing commands offer long-term
> stability. That is not just philosophical, but practically relevant.
>
> > in any event, this does mean that, stability issues aside, "git
> > diff" would apparently have worked just fine for that hook.
>
> It may have worked just fine. You should still not use it.
>
> Didn't you say that you are teaching git and hooks? Then you should
> teach the right thing, and the right thing is to use plumbing for
> scripts.
sure, i agree, but i don't recall *ever* running across the claim
that the "plumbing" commands had a long-term stability and backward
compatibility that the porcelain commands did not. is that mentioned
anywhere?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca/dokuwiki
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
