Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] format-patch: teach --range-diff to respect -v/--reroll-count

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:03 AM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The --range-diff option introduces the embedded range-diff generically
> as "Changes since previous version:", however, we can do better when
> --reroll-count is specified by emitting "Changes since v{n}:" instead.

A very similar option that I used before finding reroll count is
--subject-prefix
I still use that for RFC/WIP tags, but I sometimes used it with "PATCHv2"
as an argument, too.

Would we want to extend the niceties of this patch to that workflow?

Unrelated to this patch: how does this series cope with range diffs
that are not in commit-ish but patches on the file system?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux