On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> * sb/object-store-alloc (2018-05-16) 13 commits >> - alloc: allow arbitrary repositories for alloc functions >> - object: allow create_object to handle arbitrary repositories >> - object: allow grow_object_hash to handle arbitrary repositories >> - alloc: add repository argument to alloc_commit_index >> - alloc: add repository argument to alloc_report >> - alloc: add repository argument to alloc_object_node >> - alloc: add repository argument to alloc_tag_node >> - alloc: add repository argument to alloc_commit_node >> - alloc: add repository argument to alloc_tree_node >> - alloc: add repository argument to alloc_blob_node >> - object: add repository argument to grow_object_hash >> - object: add repository argument to create_object >> - repository: introduce parsed objects field >> (this branch is used by sb/object-store-grafts.) >> >> The conversion to pass "the_repository" and then "a_repository" >> throughout the object access API continues. >> >> Is this ready for 'next'? > > I think so. I think so, too. (I even think that for sb/object-store-grafts.) > Stefan could remove the comment "/* TODO: what about > commit->util? */" if he wants since nd/commit-util-to-slab is already > in next. But this is really minor and does not need fixing to land on > 'next'. I was about to remove that comment in the follow up[1] that I sent out yesterday, but refrained. Now that the removal of util is being merged to master, I'll include that in that series [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/20180530004810.30076-1-sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx/
