Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] config doc: mention future aspirations for transfer.fsckObjects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 9:28 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
<avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Jeff King has said on at least a couple of occasions (at least one of
> Let's note that in the documentation so we don't seem to be claiming
> that this is by design. A previous version of this change called the
> current behavior a "bug", that's probably too strong a claim, but I
> don't think anyone would dislike a hypothetical local quarantine
> patch, so let's we might change this in the future.

Maybe: s/so let's we might/so let's say we might/




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux