Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> +will instead be left unreferenced in the repository. That's considered >> +a bug, and hopefully future git release will implement a quarantine >> +for the "fetch" side as well. > > If this was a "BUGS" section in a man-page, the above might be less > scary. In this context, however, I wonder if it makes sense to tone it > down a bit: > > On the fetch side, malformed objects will instead be left > unreferenced in the repository. (However, in the future, such > objects may be quarantined for "fetch", as well.) I had an impression that nobody else sayd it is considered as a bug. Do we need to say it in this series? I'd rather not--with or without such a future modification (or lack of plan thereof), teaching the fetch side to pay attention to the various fsck tweaks is an improvement.
