Re: is the standard "[<options>]", and not "[options]" or other?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 4:45 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> but should the man pages be updated similarly? i can whip up a patch
> for that unless someone wants to comment on this further.

Yes, please!

I think [<options>] are the best, as they are pedantically correct.
[--options] is the worst, as there is not such thing as --options.

Thanks,
Stefan



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux