Re: [PATCH 1/4] Make tag names (i.e. the tag object's "tag" line) optional

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 11 June 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johan Herland <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > The tag line is now optional. If not given in the tag object data, it
> > defaults to the empty string ("") in the parsed tag object.
> 
> Sorry, I may have missed the discussion.  I recall that we
> talked about tagger line which may not exist for historical
> reasons, but have we heard any reasoning behind this?

In the discussion that followed the first proof-of-concept of 'notes',
I argued that the "tag" header is _really_ only needed for
signed tag objects (although we want it for annotated tags as well),
and that it doesn't make sense to specify a tag name for unnamed 'note'
objects.

If the "tag" line remains mandatory, I'll have to construct an
artificial name for unnamed 'notes'...


...Johan

-- 
Johan Herland, <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
www.herland.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux