Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>> I haven't really been following all of the discussion but from what I
>> can tell the point of this command is to generate a diff based on two
>> different versions of a series, so why not call it 'series-diff'? :)
>
> That's OK with me, though I prefer "range" as I think we use that term
> elsewhere ("series" is usually part of "patch series", but many people
> do not use a workflow with that term).
FWIW, I am OK with either, with a bit of preference to "range" over
"series". As long as this stays to be an independent command (as
opposed to be made into a new mode to existing command) and the
command name is not overly hard to type, I am OK with anything ;-)
