On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, I think this is clearly a case where all of the single merge-bases > we could show are equally good. And I don't think we should promise to > show a particular one, but I _do_ think it's friendly for us to have > deterministic tie-breakers (we certainly don't now). > > -Peff Right. I think we should probably have some mechanism that will allow us to always give the same answer, even if it's somewhat arbitrary. Regards, Jake
