On 5/19/2018 4:27 AM, René Scharfe wrote:
Am 19.05.2018 um 03:57 schrieb Jeff King:
These formatted integers should always fit into their
64-byte buffers. Let's use xsnprintf() to add an assertion
that this is the case, which makes auditing for other
unchecked snprintfs() easier.
How about this instead?
-- >8 --
- snprintf(ver, sizeof(ver), "%d", version);
- snprintf(date, sizeof(date), "%" PRIuMAX, (uintmax_t)last_update);
- argv[1] = ver;
- argv[2] = date;
- argv[3] = NULL;
- cp.argv = argv;
+ argv_array_push(&cp.args, core_fsmonitor);
+ argv_array_pushf(&cp.args, "%d", version);
+ argv_array_pushf(&cp.args, "%" PRIuMAX, (uintmax_t)last_update);
Looks good. Simpler, cleaner, less error prone.
cp.use_shell = 1;
cp.dir = get_git_work_tree();