Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > It's done so that commit->util can be removed. See more explanation in > the commit that removes commit->util. > > Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > sequencer.c | 12 +++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c > index 4ce5120e77..6b785c6c5f 100644 > --- a/sequencer.c > +++ b/sequencer.c > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ > #include "hashmap.h" > #include "notes-utils.h" > #include "sigchain.h" > +#include "commit-slab.h" > > #define GIT_REFLOG_ACTION "GIT_REFLOG_ACTION" > > @@ -3160,6 +3161,7 @@ static enum check_level get_missing_commit_check_level(void) > return CHECK_IGNORE; > } > > +define_commit_slab(commit_seen, uint8_t); Because it makes no difference on any real platform that matters, it is purely academic preference, but the user of this code does not care about ensuring that commit-seen data is at lesat 8-bit wide, which is where we should use uint8_t. We know this is a simple yes/no field, so use of "uint8_t" here is quite misleading to the readers. "unsigned char" or "char" would be a lot better.
