Am 13.05.2018 um 04:24 schrieb brian m. carlson:
Adjust the test so that it computes values for blobs instead of using
hard-coded hashes.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
t/t4014-format-patch.sh | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t4014-format-patch.sh b/t/t4014-format-patch.sh
index dac3f349a3..42b3e11207 100755
--- a/t/t4014-format-patch.sh
+++ b/t/t4014-format-patch.sh
@@ -578,7 +578,9 @@ test_expect_success 'excessive subject' '
rm -rf patches/ &&
git checkout side &&
+ before=$(git rev-parse --short $(git hash-object file)) &&
for i in 5 6 1 2 3 A 4 B C 7 8 9 10 D E F; do echo "$i"; done >>file &&
+ after=$(git rev-parse --short $(git hash-object file)) &&
It would be better to avoid process expansion in command arguments,
because the shell does not diagnose failures. This is preferable:
before=$(git hash-object file) &&
before=$(git rev-parse --short $before) &&
-- Hannes
