Hi, On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > > > ... Guess how surprised > > _I_ was, when I hit the error message which made me go mad. > > To be fair, that ugly "char%d" was taken from mktag and not > Johan's invention. Yes, I should have said that. I tried to hint to this by "you could just as well clean the code up", meaning the existing code. Now, _that_ would be a patch I'd be really thankful for. As for the general direction of implementing notes as tags: If you want to make them fetchable, you have to deal with conflicts. If you want to be able to amend notes, _especially_ when they should be fetchable, you want a history on them. Which makes me think that tags are not the right object type for notes. But I guess I'll just wait if somebody actually comments on my RFC for lightweight commit annotations (that's what I put into that discussion). BTW I just realized that I marked it [PATCH], while it should have been [RFC]. Sorry. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
