Re: [PATCH 2/4] mark_parents_uninteresting(): drop missing object check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

>   2. It "lies" about the commit by setting the parsed flag,
>      even though we didn't load any useful data into the
>      struct. This shouldn't matter for the UNINTERESTING
>      case, but we may later clear our flags and do another
>      traversal in the same process. While pretty unlikely,
>      it's possible that we could then look at the same
>      commit without the UNINTERESTING flag,...

Yeah, if two ranges given to tbdiff to be compared are computed
in-core, uninteresting boundary of one range is likely to be
interesting on the other range.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux