On 10 May 2018 at 14:43, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The SHA1 prefix 06fa currently matches no blobs in git.git. When
> disambiguating short SHA1s we've been quietly ignoring the user's type
> selector as a fallback mechanism, this was intentionally added in
> 1ffa26c461 ("get_short_sha1: list ambiguous objects on error",
> 2016-09-26).
>
> I think that behavior makes sense, it's not very useful to just show
> nothing because a preference has been expressed via core.disambiguate,
> but it's bad that we're quietly doing this. The user might thing that
> we just didn't understand what e.g 06fa^{blob} meant.
>
> Now we'll instead print a warning if no objects of the requested type
> were found:
>
> $ git rev-parse 06fa^{blob}
> error: short SHA1 06fa is ambiguous
> hint: The candidates are:
> [... no blobs listed ...]
> warning: Your hint (via core.disambiguate or peel syntax) was ignored, we fell
> back to showing all object types since no object of the requested type
> matched the provide short SHA1 06fa
s/ignored, we/ignored. We/? IMHO, it would read easier.
s/provide short/provided short/
Also: s/SHA1/object id/? That said, you add the warning. The error
message is already there and you are simply following its "SHA1".
Martin
