Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > I don't think it's worth re-rolling, but one thing to think about for > future cleanups: you split the patches by touched area, not by > functionality. So the first three patches have a "while we're here..." > that has to explain why dropping the "static" is the right thing over > and over. If you instead did the error-handling fixes independently > first, then you could lump the "static" cleanups together with one > explanation (possibly even just as part of the 4th patch). Thanks Peff for a good pice of advice. I agree with the assessment after reading the series through (includng "not worth rerolling" part). Thanks, Martin.
