Re: [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: render revisions correctly under Asciidoctor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8 May 2018 at 03:13, brian m. carlson <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 06:11:43AM +0200, Martin Ågren wrote:
>> Excellent. These two patches fix my original problem and seem like the
>> obviously correct approach (in hindsight ;-) ). I wonder if the diagrams
>> earlier in the file should be tackled also. Right now, one has a huge
>> number of dots instead of the four you added; the other has none. They
>> do render fine though, so that'd only be about consistency in the
>> original .txt-file.
>
> Yeah, the number of dots has to be at least four, but can be any
> matching number.
>
> Since this patch fixes the present issue, I'd like to leave it as it is
> and run through a cleanup series a bit later that catches all the
> literal indented blocks and marks them explicitly to avoid this issue in
> the future.

Sounds like a plan. :-) As noted elsewhere, I have no immediate idea how
to identify which of the 13000 tab-indented lines are really part of
diagrams and ascii-art. Counting the number of spaces? Anyway, thanks
for this mini-series.

Martin




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux