This effectively disables the check when creating and fscking tag objects,
which is desirable because we don't want the fact that the object is
already parsed to stop us from verifying thoroughly.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
On Saturday 09 June 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johan Herland <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > diff --git a/tag.c b/tag.c
> > index 19c66cd..b134967 100644
> > --- a/tag.c
> > +++ b/tag.c
> > @@ -46,9 +46,11 @@ static int parse_tag_buffer_internal(struct tag *item, const char *data, const u
> > const char *type_line, *tag_line, *tagger_line;
> > unsigned long type_len, tag_len;
> >
> > - if (item->object.parsed)
> > - return 0;
> > - item->object.parsed = 1;
> > + if (item) {
> > + if (item->object.parsed)
> > + return 0;
> > + item->object.parsed = 1;
> > + }
>
> Passing both item and data does not feel right. If you are
> trying to make the factored out function to do the verification
> of data, then perhaps the caller should do the "don't handle the
> same data twice" optimization using item?
You mean, like this?
...Johan
tag.c | 10 ++++------
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tag.c b/tag.c
index 2b92465..4e79943 100644
--- a/tag.c
+++ b/tag.c
@@ -75,12 +75,6 @@ int parse_and_verify_tag_buffer(struct tag *item,
unsigned long type_len, tag_len, keywords_len, tagger_len;
const char *header_end;
- if (item) {
- if (item->object.parsed)
- return 0;
- item->object.parsed = 1;
- }
-
if (size < 65)
return FAIL("Tag object failed preliminary size check");
@@ -264,6 +258,10 @@ int parse_and_verify_tag_buffer(struct tag *item,
int parse_tag_buffer(struct tag *item, void *data, unsigned long size)
{
+ if (item->object.parsed)
+ return 0;
+ item->object.parsed = 1;
+
return parse_and_verify_tag_buffer(item, (const char *) data, size, 0);
}
--
1.5.2.1.144.gabc40
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
