On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 10:32 PM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Duy, > > On Thu, 3 May 2018, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > >> On Thu, 3 May 2018, Duy Nguyen wrote: >> >> > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 5:30 PM, Johannes Schindelin >> > <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: >> > > diff --git a/command-list.txt b/command-list.txt >> > > index a1fad28fd82..c89ac8f417f 100644 >> > > --- a/command-list.txt >> > > +++ b/command-list.txt >> > > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ git-archive mainporcelain >> > > git-bisect mainporcelain info >> > > git-blame ancillaryinterrogators >> > > git-branch mainporcelain history >> > > +git-branch-diff mainporcelain info >> > >> > Making it part of "git help" with the info keywords at this stage may >> > be premature. "git help" is about _common_ commands and we don't know >> > (yet) how popular this will be. >> >> Makes sense. I removed the `mainporcelain` keyword locally. > > On second thought, I *think* you meant to imply that I should remove that > line altogether. Will do that now. Actually I only suggested to remove the last word "info". That was what made this command "common". Classifying all commands in this file is definitely a good thing, and I think mainporcelain is the right choice. -- Duy
