On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> #include "cache.h"
>> #include "object.h"
>> @@ -30,8 +31,25 @@ struct alloc_state {
>> int count; /* total number of nodes allocated */
>> int nr; /* number of nodes left in current allocation */
>> void *p; /* first free node in current allocation */
>> +
>> + /* bookkeeping of allocations */
>> + void **slabs;
>
> Another way to manage this is linked list: you could reserve one
> "object" in each slab to store the "next" (or "prev") pointer to
> another slab, then you can just walk through all slabs and free. It's
> a bit cheaper than reallocating slabs[], but I guess we reallocate so
> few times that readability matters more (whichever way is chosen).
This is a good idea. I'll do so in a resend.
>> +void clear_alloc_state(struct alloc_state *s)
>> +{
>> + while (s->slab_nr > 0) {
>> + s->slab_nr--;
>> + free(s->slabs[s->slab_nr]);
>
> I think you're leaking memory here. Commit and tree objects may have
> more allocations in them (especially trees, but I think we have
> commit_list in struct commit too). Those need to be freed as well.
I would think that tree and commit memory will be free'd in the
parsed_objects release function? (TODO: I need to add it over there)
Thanks,
Stefan
