Re: [PATCH v3 09/12] get_short_oid / peel_onion: ^{tree} should be tree, not treeish

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason  <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> But ^{tree} shows just the trees, but would previously be equivalent
> to the above:
>
>     $ git rev-parse e8f2^{tree}
>     error: short SHA1 e8f2 is ambiguous
>     hint: The candidates are:
>     hint:   e8f2093055 tree
>     hint:   e8f25a3a50 tree
>     hint:   e8f28d537c tree
>     hint:   e8f2cf6ec0 tree
>     [...]

When a user says "git $cmd e8f2^{tree}", the user is telling Git
that s/he knows e8f2 *is* a tree-ish, but for whatever reason $cmd
wants a tree and does not accept an arbitrary tree-ish---that is the
whole piont of appending ^{tree} as a suffix.  A useful hint in such
a case would be "oh, you said e8f2 is a tree-ish, but there are more
than one tree-ish, so let me show them to you to help you decide
which one among them is the one you meant".  When $cmd is rev-parse,
I would even say that the user is saying "I know e8f2 is a tree-ish,
and I know it not a tree--it merely is a tree-ish.  I want the tree
that e8f2 thing points at".

Limiting that hint to show only real trees does not make any sense
to me.  I do not think we care _too_ deeply, because most of the
time, command line location that expects a tree-ish can be given a
tree-ish, so there is not much reason to use ^{tree} suffix these
days.  But in a case where it _does_ matter, I think this change
makes the "hint" almost useless.

Or am I misleading what you wanted to achieve with this patch?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux