On 04/30, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * bw/protocol-v2 (2018-03-15) 35 commits > (merged to 'next' on 2018-04-11 at 23ee234a2c) > + remote-curl: don't request v2 when pushing > + remote-curl: implement stateless-connect command > + http: eliminate "# service" line when using protocol v2 > + http: don't always add Git-Protocol header > + http: allow providing extra headers for http requests > + remote-curl: store the protocol version the server responded with > + remote-curl: create copy of the service name > + pkt-line: add packet_buf_write_len function > + transport-helper: introduce stateless-connect > + transport-helper: refactor process_connect_service > + transport-helper: remove name parameter > + connect: don't request v2 when pushing > + connect: refactor git_connect to only get the protocol version once > + fetch-pack: support shallow requests > + fetch-pack: perform a fetch using v2 > + upload-pack: introduce fetch server command > + push: pass ref prefixes when pushing > + fetch: pass ref prefixes when fetching > + ls-remote: pass ref prefixes when requesting a remote's refs > + transport: convert transport_get_remote_refs to take a list of ref prefixes > + transport: convert get_refs_list to take a list of ref prefixes > + connect: request remote refs using v2 > + ls-refs: introduce ls-refs server command > + serve: introduce git-serve > + test-pkt-line: introduce a packet-line test helper > + protocol: introduce enum protocol_version value protocol_v2 > + transport: store protocol version > + connect: discover protocol version outside of get_remote_heads > + connect: convert get_remote_heads to use struct packet_reader > + transport: use get_refs_via_connect to get refs > + upload-pack: factor out processing lines > + upload-pack: convert to a builtin > + pkt-line: add delim packet support > + pkt-line: allow peeking a packet line without consuming it > + pkt-line: introduce packet_read_with_status > (this branch is used by bw/server-options.) > > The beginning of the next-gen transfer protocol. > > Will merge to 'master'. Awesome, I see you're already planning on merging this! I was just going to drop by and saw that internal testing showed that this *should* be ready to be merged to master :) Thanks! -- Brandon Williams
