Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Casey Fitzpatrick <kcghost@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> It also seems to be missing "--progress", and I imagine others.
>> Perhaps submodule add/update should be reworked to automatically
>> accept all the options that clone would?
>
> --progress is not missing, but I see that it isn't documented. It was
> added in 72c5f88311 ("clone: pass --progress decision to recursive
> submodules", 2016-09-22). What you're suggesting makes sense, but as
> shown in that commit it's not easy for it to happen automatically,
> there's a lot of boilerplate involved.
>
> But since you're interested you can see how to add new options with
> that patch, it should be easy for anyone not experienced with the
> codebase, it's all just boilerplate + adding a test.
I think it is going in the right direction overall, but a few corner
cases may need special attention. "add" may be adding a new module
that locally originates, in which case "clone" is not relevant.
Similarly, for "update"options for "clone" are not relevant unless
it is the very initial one.
