Am 01.05.2018 um 13:57 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
Hi Hannes,
On Mon, 30 Apr 2018, Johannes Sixt wrote:
Am 30.04.2018 um 05:25 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
* js/no-pager-shorthand (2018-04-25) 1 commit
- git: add -N as a short option for --no-pager
"git --no-pager cmd" did not have short-and-sweet single letter
option. Now it does.
Will merge to 'next'.
I consider your argument that -N is only an abbreviation for an unspecific
"no" a valid one. So, I would like to be sure that we are not painting us into
the wrong corner by squatting -N for --no-pager.
I find -P is not that bad after all.
To me, `-P` would suggest the positive action --pager rather than the
negative --no-pager.
I wonder whether `-!p` would be better/feasible?
We do not have this pattern, yet, nor do I know it from some other
utility. I do not want to set a precedent.
Your use case is quite the corner case, I hope you realize that, as it
seems that everybody else is fine with having -FRX as default options for
`less`... And with copy/pasting from the `less` output. So introducing a
sweet short option for --no-pager, for the benefit of maybe even only one
user, seems quite... unusual.
Granted, you cannot simply introduce an alias for `git --no-pager`. But
maybe that is what we should do? Maybe we should start supporting aliases
without specifying commands, opening the door for things like `git -c
ui.color=false`, too.
Then you could add `alias.n=--no-pager` and call `git n show HEAD`, and
the -N and -P short options could still wait for a widely-popular option
to require a short name.
But then I can just as well have alias gitn='git --no-pager' in my
.bashrc. Maybe I should do that.
Given the ambivalence (or inconclusiveness), I retract this patch
without offering a replacement for the time being.
Thanks for a bit of sanity,
-- Hannes
