Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] ref-filter: fix outdated comment on in_commit_list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Derrick Stolee <dstolee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The in_commit_list() method does not check the parents of
> the candidate for containment in the list. Fix the comment
> that incorrectly states that it does.
>
> Reported-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  ref-filter.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/ref-filter.c b/ref-filter.c
> index cffd8bf3ce..aff24d93be 100644
> --- a/ref-filter.c
> +++ b/ref-filter.c
> @@ -1582,7 +1582,7 @@ static int in_commit_list(const struct commit_list *want, struct commit *c)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * Test whether the candidate or one of its parents is contained in the list.
> + * Test whether the candidate is contained in the list.
>   * Do not recurse to find out, though, but return -1 if inconclusive.
>   */
>  static enum contains_result contains_test(struct commit *candidate,

All right. Always good to have comment and code match.


FYI: the contains_test() function described in this comment only checks
the candidate, and never access candidate commit parents.  All
recursion, which naturally includes checking parents, is in the
contains_tag_algo().

I guess that the code was refactored, but comment had not been changed.

-- 
Jakub Narębski




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux