On 2018-04-26 19:23, Elijah Newren wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@xxxxxx> wrote:
Hm,
thanks for the report.
I don't have a high sierra box, but I can probably get one.
t0050 -should- pass automagically, so I feel that I can do something.
Unless someone is faster of course.
Sweet, thanks for taking a look.
Is it possible that you run
debug=t verbose=t ./t0050-filesystem.sh
and send the output to me ?
Sure. First, though, note that I can make it pass (or at least "not
ok...TODO known breakage") with the following patch (may be
whitespace-damaged by gmail):
diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
index 483c8d6d7..770b91f8c 100644
--- a/t/test-lib.sh
+++ b/t/test-lib.sh
@@ -1106,12 +1106,7 @@ test_lazy_prereq UTF8_NFD_TO_NFC '
auml=$(printf "\303\244")
aumlcdiar=$(printf "\141\314\210")
>"$auml" &&
- case "$(echo *)" in
- "$aumlcdiar")
- true ;;
- *)
- false ;;
- esac
+ stat "$aumlcdiar" >/dev/null 2>/dev/null
Nicely analyzed and improved.
The "stat" statement is technically correct.
I think that a more git-style fix would be
[] ---
+ test -r "$aumlcdiar"
instead of the stat.
I looked into the 2 known breakages.
In short: they test use cases which are not sooo important for a user in
practice, but do a good test if the code is broken.
IOW: I can't see a need for immediate action.
As you already did all the analyzes:
Do you want to send a patch ?
