Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Am 15.04.2018 um 23:35 schrieb Junio C Hamano: >> Ah, do you mean we have an internal sequence like this, when "rebase >> --continue" wants to conclude an edit/reword? > > Yes, it's only 'reword' that is affected, because then subsequent > picks are processed by the original process. Ah, OK, that is a good explanation.
