Hi, On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > That said, I read the draft and found it good except for two minor issues, Thanks for your comments! > 1. I see the following sentence in the "Rebasing merges: a jorney to the > ultimate solution (Road Clear) (written by Jacob Keller)" article > > "A few examples were tried, but it was proven that the original > concept did not work, as dropped commits could end up being > replaid into the merge commits, turning them into "evil" > merges." > > I'm not sure if 'replaid' is proper English assuming the past tense of > replay was intended there (which I think is 'replayed'). I agree and changed it to "replayed". > 2. I see a minor Markdown syntax issue in the "branch -l: print useful > info whilst rebasing a non-local branch" article. > > ... reworked his original patch to improve `git branch > --list̀ > > Specifically, in the '--list̀' part. I guess it should be "--list`". Yeah, it's fixed too. Thanks, Christian.
