Re: [PATCH 8/8] gpg-interface: handle alternative signature types

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 04:24:27AM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> How confident are we that _all_ possible signing programs will conform
>> to the "-----BEGIN %s-----" pattern? If we're not confident, then
>> perhaps the user should be providing the full string here, not just
>> the '%s' part?
>
> This is not likely to be true of other signing schemes.  In fact, other
> than OpenPGP, PEM, and CMS (S/MIME), this is probably not true at all.

Hmph.  

That argues more strongly that we would regret unless we make the
end-user configuration to at least the whole string (which later can
be promoted to "a pattern that matches the whole string"), not just
the part after mandatory "-----BEGIN ", methinks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux