Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Generational repacking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/8/07, Sam Vilain <sam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ok.  But if repack is generational you probably don't mind waiting for
it on commit so don't need to background it.

Agreed. The patch I posted back then was on fetch as a signle fetch is
more likely to bring a lot of new objects in. (Moreso than a commit)

Repack-on-commit if there's more than 1k unpacked objects makes sense.
Are fetches nowaways always using the "keep pack" and "fatten thin
pack" semantics? If yes, then

cheers,



martin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux