Re: git-gui branches, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2018, #01; Mon, 9)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>>> * bb/git-gui-ssh-key-files (2018-03-02) 2 commits

This looks good to me.
Please merge down.

>>> * bp/git-gui-bind-kp-enter (2018-03-02) 2 commits

I tested and reviewed this, and it also looks good to me.

>>> * cb/git-gui-ttk-style (2018-03-05) 2 commits

While this looks like it doesn't break anything, and it does what
it intends to do, I am not sure if that is the best approach.
I'll look into Tcl and experiment to have an opinion.

>> What is your plan with those? I thought they were on track for v2.17.0,
>> but now I see that they are not even in `next`...
>
> There is no plan. I was waiting for somebody to raise noises, get
> irritated by lack of active subsystem maintainer(s), which would
> eventually lead us to find a replacement for Pat.

Ok, glad that Johannes made noise then.
I am a heavy user of git-gui myself so I would feel sad if it wasn't
properly maintained. (On the other hand it "just works" -- for me)
I'd be ok to step up as a maintainer there in the long run if nobody
else steps up.

> I can play patch-monkey for git-gui part but I do not want to be the
> one who judges if proposed changes to it are good ones.  Have they
> been reviewed by git-gui competent people?

For now please apply (or monkey-patch as you put it) the
first and second.

Thanks,
Stefan



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux