Ben Toews <mastahyeti@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Hmmmm, what vintage of our codebase is this patch based on? Did I >> miss a patch that removes these lines >> >> >> printf ' ' >sigblanknonlfile >> get_tag_header blanknonlfile-signed-tag $commit commit $time >expect >> echo '-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----' >>expect >> test_expect_success GPG \ >> 'creating a signed tag with spaces and no newline should succeed' ' >> git tag -s -F sigblanknonlfile blanknonlfile-signed-tag && >> get_tag_msg blanknonlfile-signed-tag >actual && >> test_cmp expect actual && >> git tag -v signed-tag >> ' >> >> which appear between the pre- and post- context of the lines you are >> inserting? They date back to 2007-2009. >> > > That test was fixed a week ago: > https://github.com/git/git/commit/a99d903f21d102a5768f19157085a9733aeb68dd Well, you cannot expect any reviewer to know about a change that has never been sent to the list and has never been part of even 'pu' branch, no matter how old such a private "fix" is. What other unpublished things that are not even on 'pu' do these patches depend on?
