Re: pull/merge --no-commit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, kurt_p_lloyd wrote:

> Except here's the model that I am trying to follow....
> It seems that 'pull' can be partitioned into 3 separate responsibilities:
>
>   1. Retrieve changes from the remote user's replica (without modifying
>      any /local/ branches).
>   2. Bring changes from "remote" into a local branch (without commit).
>   3. Commit.

I believe you can accomplish step one with a remote tracking branch
("git-remote add localname git://whereever/project.git" to add the branch
to the repository, then "git-remote update localname" to update it to the
current remote state).

-- 
The universe hates you, but don't worry - it's nothing personal.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux