Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] object-store refactoring 3 (replace objects, main ref store)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 2:50 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 1:21 AM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:     *
>> diff --git a/repository.h b/repository.h
>> index 09df94a472..2922d3a28b 100644
>> --- a/repository.h
>> +++ b/repository.h
>> @@ -26,6 +26,11 @@ struct repository {
>>          */
>>         struct raw_object_store *objects;
>>
>> +       /*
>> +        * The store in which the refs are hold.
>> +        */
>> +       struct ref_store *main_ref_store;
>> +
>
> We probably should drop the main_ prefix here because this could also
> be a submodule ref store (when the repository is about a submodule).

it's still the main ref store of the submodule, then. :)
But yes, I agree we should rename it. Now or eventually later?

> worktree ref store is a different story and I don't know how to best
> present it here yet (I'm still thinking a separate struct repository).

I imagine that we'd rather want to have arrays of config/worktree path/refs
when needed and the worktree is just an index into all of these things?

> But we can worry about that when struct repository supports multiple
> worktree.

ok. Thanks for bringing this to my attention.

Thanks,
Stefan



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux