Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Lazy-load trees when reading commit-graph

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 6:15 AM, Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I don't understand how folding the patches makes the correctness clearer,
> since the rename (1/4) is checked by the compiler and the Coccinelle script
> (3/4) only works after that rename is complete.
>
> The only thing I can imagine is that it makes smaller patch emails, since
> there is only one large patch instead of two. In this case, I prefer to make
> changes that are easier to check by automation (compiler and coccinelle).
>

I prefer the offloading to automation, too.
So I would vouch for keeping it as-is.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux