On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 06:26:49PM +0200, Harald Nordgren wrote: > It would be nice to have a uniform option like > '--sort=version:refname'. But spending a few hours to look over the > code, it seems that ls-remote.c would require a lot of rewrites if we > wanted to start using `ref_array` and `ref_array_item` for storing the > refs. > > Which seems necessary in order to hook in to the sorting flow used in > other subcommands. That, or reimplement `cmp_ref_sorting`. But maybe > I'm missing something? I haven't looked at how painful it might be to use ref-filter.c, but it would buy us even more if we could. That would open up other options like --format, I think (OTOH there may be some funny corner cases; that code assumes we're talking about local refs, so if you were to ask for "%(committerdate)" or something, we might have to more cleanly handle the case where we don't actually have the object). -Peff
