Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > If you are really doing your own development, then you would have > some topic branches of your own, with forks of some (but most likely > not all, especiallyi when there are many branches at the upstream) > branches you got from the upstream, and "git branch --list" that > shows only your own and what you are interested in (i.e. those that > you actually bothered to "git checkout <branchname>") without > showing random other branches that exist at the remote but do not > interest you is a feature. Your hypothetical "clone" that > indiscriminatedly forks all branches at remote locally will destroy > the usefulness of it. Related to this, a feature I have long thought we wished to have is complete opposite of this. After creating and working on a local topic branch and then concluding the work on it, a user would "git push" the branch out to a remote, and then check out a different branch (e.g. the 'master' branch). I wish we had a mode that would automatically *delete* the local topic branch that has already been pushed out (and more importantly, a branch that I have *done* with, at least for now), to unclutter my local branch namespace. When I want to further work on it, I can ask "git checkout" to dwim to recreate one on demand. Of course, there are some wrinkles due to pesky impleemntation details (e.g. the "autonuke-and-recreate" would lose reflog), but I do not think it is fundamental hurdle.
