Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > @@ -184,6 +183,7 @@ Valid `[type]`'s include: > --bool-or-int:: > --path:: > --expiry-date:: > +--color:: > Historical options for selecting a type specifier. Prefer instead `--type`, > (see: above). > > @@ -223,6 +223,9 @@ Valid `[type]`'s include: > output it as the ANSI color escape sequence to the standard > output. The optional `default` parameter is used instead, if > there is no color configured for `name`. > ++ > +It is preferred to use `--type=color`, or `--type=color --default=[default]` > +instead of `--get-color`. Wasn't the whole point of the preliminary --type=<type> patch to avoid having to add thse two hunks?
