Hi Peff, On Thu, 29 Mar 2018, Jeff King wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 05:18:45PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > The test case 'unset with cont. lines' relied on a bug that is about to > > be fixed: it tests *explicitly* that removing the last entry from a > > config section leaves an *empty* section behind. > > > > Let's fix this test case not to rely on that behavior, simply by > > preventing the section from becoming empty. > > Seems like a good solution. I don't think we care in particular about > testing a multi-line value at the end of the file. ... and if we did, we should have documented that. Ciao, Dscho
