On 03/28, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * bw/protocol-v2 (2018-03-15) 35 commits > - remote-curl: don't request v2 when pushing > - remote-curl: implement stateless-connect command > - http: eliminate "# service" line when using protocol v2 > - http: don't always add Git-Protocol header > - http: allow providing extra headers for http requests > - remote-curl: store the protocol version the server responded with > - remote-curl: create copy of the service name > - pkt-line: add packet_buf_write_len function > - transport-helper: introduce stateless-connect > - transport-helper: refactor process_connect_service > - transport-helper: remove name parameter > - connect: don't request v2 when pushing > - connect: refactor git_connect to only get the protocol version once > - fetch-pack: support shallow requests > - fetch-pack: perform a fetch using v2 > - upload-pack: introduce fetch server command > - push: pass ref prefixes when pushing > - fetch: pass ref prefixes when fetching > - ls-remote: pass ref prefixes when requesting a remote's refs > - transport: convert transport_get_remote_refs to take a list of ref prefixes > - transport: convert get_refs_list to take a list of ref prefixes > - connect: request remote refs using v2 > - ls-refs: introduce ls-refs server command > - serve: introduce git-serve > - test-pkt-line: introduce a packet-line test helper > - protocol: introduce enum protocol_version value protocol_v2 > - transport: store protocol version > - connect: discover protocol version outside of get_remote_heads > - connect: convert get_remote_heads to use struct packet_reader > - transport: use get_refs_via_connect to get refs > - upload-pack: factor out processing lines > - upload-pack: convert to a builtin > - pkt-line: add delim packet support > - pkt-line: allow peeking a packet line without consuming it > - pkt-line: introduce packet_read_with_status > > The beginning of the next-gen transfer protocol. > > Is everybody happy with this version? One design decision with > larger consequence "to or not to build in?" has been settled in > favor of status quo, IIRC. I haven't heard anymore complaints with this version so I *think* it should be good. -- Brandon Williams
