Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] rebase-interactive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] rebase-interactive
From: Jeff Hostetler <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 06:03:28 -0400
Cc: Wink Saville <wink@xxxxxxxxxxx>, jeffhost@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Git List <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <xmqqy3ie9kdv.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
References: <cover.1521779249.git.wink@saville.com> <cover.1521839546.git.wink@saville.com> <CAKk8isqj3OusAE8OJtcys0a-Yj9fgQNn=DtLe-ZGYNzcKp=-3Q@mail.gmail.com> <xmqq7eq2h0wa.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> <CAKk8isoJQrikitO7ezRajgphUXYR6207k4UkXP6r57WJEFBaDA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKk8ispSgNgZxS7KfuOyxfU53tzesvNyLRaNXFZa3K7SCbaRkQ@mail.gmail.com> <xmqqzi2ude4w.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> <9ca76d31-828d-0b6f-5069-375792c1f55d@jeffhostetler.com> <xmqqh8p2d8jh.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> <d56a60a8-e735-b147-a2e6-4e48461ad701@jeffhostetler.com> <xmqqy3ie9kdv.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/59.0



On 3/27/2018 1:07 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Jeff Hostetler <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

[...]

So I would think it is most sensible to have double, uintmax_t and
intmax_t variants.  If you do not care about the extra value range
that unsigned integral types afford, a single intmax_t variant would
also be fine.


I'll reroll with just the double and intmax_t variants.
Thanks for the feedback and sorry for all the noise.

Jeff

References:
- [RFC PATCH v4] rebase-interactive
  - From: Wink Saville
- [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] rebase-interactive
  - From: Wink Saville
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] rebase-interactive
  - From: Wink Saville
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] rebase-interactive
  - From: Junio C Hamano
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] rebase-interactive
  - From: Wink Saville
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] rebase-interactive
  - From: Wink Saville
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] rebase-interactive
  - From: Junio C Hamano
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] rebase-interactive
  - From: Jeff Hostetler
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] rebase-interactive
  - From: Junio C Hamano
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] rebase-interactive
  - From: Jeff Hostetler
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] rebase-interactive
  - From: Junio C Hamano

Prev by Date: A bug in git merge
Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] json-writer: incorrect format specifier
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] rebase-interactive
Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] rebase-interactive
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]