On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 03:18:20PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > The test enumerates reflog entries in an arbitrary order and then sorts > > them. For SHA-1, this produces results that happen to sort in > > alphabetical order, but for other hash algorithms they sort differently. > > Ensure we sort the reflog entries in a hash-independent way by sorting > > on the ref name instead of the object ID. > > Makes sense. > > > Remove an assumption about the length of a hash by using cut with > > the delimiter and field options instead of the character range > > option. > > I thought you used your truncated blake hash to develop and verify > these changes, but I'd imagine that the "42" thing were hard to > spot. Yeah, I had to do those by hand, but it looks like I did miss one. I'll reroll with that change. -- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US https://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
