Hi all, On Mon, 26 Mar 2018, Wink Saville wrote: > > I was just going by what the reported compiler error message was. > > It said that "unsigned long" didn't match the uint64_t variable. > > And that made me nervous. > > > > If all of the platforms we build on define uintmax_t >= 64 bits, > > then it doesn't matter. > > > > If we do have a platform where uintmax_t is u32, then we'll have a > > lot more breakage than in just the new function I added. > > > > Thanks, > > Jeff > > Should we add a "_Static_assert" that sizeof(uintmax_t) >= sizeof(uint64_t) ? To come back to the subject that all of the mails in this here mail thread of you gentle people bear: Wink's patches look good to me, and I would like to have them be bumped down the next/master waterfall. Ciao, Dscho
