On Mon, Mar 26 2018, Daniel Jacques wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 5:15 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> This looks good to me this time around, couple of small nits (maybe
>> Junio can amend while queuing):
>
>> * You add a dependnecy typo in 2/3 but fix it again in 3/3. Should be
>> squashed.
>
> d'oh, I'll fix that in my local copy so that if I do end up needing to
> upload a new version, it's available.
\o/
>> * s/\Q${gitexecdir_relative}\E$// in 2/3 can be done less verbosely as
>> s/\Q$gitexecdir_relative\E$//. Discussed before in
>
> https://public-inbox.org/git/CAD1RUU-3Q_SYvJorU+vEY2-0CPMZ1eL-41Z6eL7Sq4USiJ0U+w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>> seems like something you just forgot about.
>
> Oh sorry, I must have missed that. I have a personal preference for adding
> brackets for clarity; it leaked into this patch set. I did implement most
> of the suggestion, which was to use the escaped Q/E instead of equals.
>
> Stylistically I still prefer the braces, but I'll defer to you and remove
> them in my pending patch set in case I'm asked to submit another version.
If you prefer it that way just keep your version. It's your code and
it's just a trivial style difference.
I just mentioned it because in the previous discussion you said "I agree
it's cleaner" so I inferred that you'd just forgotten about it but meant
to change it. It's also fine if later you just thought "you know what,
I'm doing it my way" :)
