[PATCH v5 3/6] worktree: remove force_new_branch from struct add_opts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The 'force_new_branch' flag in 'struct add_opts' is only used inside the
add function, where we already have the same information stored in the
'new_branch_force' variable.  Avoid that unnecessary duplication.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 builtin/worktree.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin/worktree.c b/builtin/worktree.c
index a082230b6c..1e4a919a00 100644
--- a/builtin/worktree.c
+++ b/builtin/worktree.c
@@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ struct add_opts {
 	int checkout;
 	int keep_locked;
 	const char *new_branch;
-	int force_new_branch;
 };
 
 static int show_only;
@@ -405,8 +404,7 @@ static int add(int ac, const char **av, const char *prefix)
 	if (!strcmp(branch, "-"))
 		branch = "@{-1}";
 
-	opts.force_new_branch = !!new_branch_force;
-	if (opts.force_new_branch) {
+	if (new_branch_force) {
 		struct strbuf symref = STRBUF_INIT;
 
 		opts.new_branch = new_branch_force;
@@ -450,7 +448,7 @@ static int add(int ac, const char **av, const char *prefix)
 		struct child_process cp = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
 		cp.git_cmd = 1;
 		argv_array_push(&cp.args, "branch");
-		if (opts.force_new_branch)
+		if (new_branch_force)
 			argv_array_push(&cp.args, "--force");
 		argv_array_push(&cp.args, opts.new_branch);
 		argv_array_push(&cp.args, branch);
-- 
2.16.1.77.g8685934aa2




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux