Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/9] Call git_rebase__interactive from run_specific_rebase

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Wink Saville <wink@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Instead of indirectly invoking git_rebase__interactive this invokes
>> it directly after sourcing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wink Saville <wink@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  git-rebase--interactive.sh | 11 -----------
>>  git-rebase.sh              | 11 +++++++++--
>>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/git-rebase--interactive.sh b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
>> index 561e2660e..213d75f43 100644
>> --- a/git-rebase--interactive.sh
>> +++ b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
>> @@ -740,15 +740,6 @@ get_missing_commit_check_level () {
>>       printf '%s' "$check_level" | tr 'A-Z' 'a-z'
>>  }
>>
>> -# The whole contents of this file is run by dot-sourcing it from
>> -# inside a shell function.  It used to be that "return"s we see
>> -# below were not inside any function, and expected to return
>> -# to the function that dot-sourced us.
>> -#
>> -# However, older (9.x) versions of FreeBSD /bin/sh misbehave on such a
>> -# construct and continue to run the statements that follow such a "return".
>> -# As a work-around, we introduce an extra layer of a function
>> -# here, and immediately call it after defining it.
>
> We still enclose the whole thing (including the returns that are
> problematic for older FreeBSD shells) in a shell function, so it's
> not like we are dropping the workaround for these systems.  It's
> just the caller of the function moved.
>
> I think the removal of this large comment is justifiable, but the
> structure still needs a bit of explanation, especially given that
> the caller in git-rebase.sh needs to treat this scriptlet a bit
> differently from others.
>
> If we were not in the (longer term) process of getting rid of
> git-rebase.sh, it might even make sense to port the same
> "dot-sourced scriptlet defines a shell function to be called, and
> the caller calls it after dot-sourcing it" pattern to other rebase
> backends, so that the calling side can be unified again to become
> something like:
>
>         . git-rebase--$type
>         git_rebase__$type
>         ret=$?

I've gone with the above suggestion and added back some
of the header.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux