Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> To make it bullet-proof, I think we'd have to actually parse the graph >> structure, finding a "*" line and then accepting only an indent that >> matched it. > > Wow. Nerd snipe successful. This turned out to be quite tricky, but also > kind of interesting. The last patch looks quite "interesting" ;-). The idea is sound and probably the execution, too, but it indeed is tricky. > > Here's a series which fixes it. The meaty bits are in the final commit; > the rest is just preparatory cleanup, and adding some tests (all are > cases which I managed to break while fixing this). > > [1/7]: diff-highlight: correct test graph diagram > [2/7]: diff-highlight: use test_tick in graph test > [3/7]: diff-highlight: prefer "echo" to "cat" in tests > [4/7]: diff-highlight: test interleaved parallel lines of history > [5/7]: diff-highlight: test graphs with --color > [6/7]: diff-highlight: factor out flush_hunk() helper > [7/7]: diff-highlight: detect --graph by indent > > contrib/diff-highlight/DiffHighlight.pm | 89 +++++++++++++++---- > .../diff-highlight/t/t9400-diff-highlight.sh | 81 +++++++++++++---- > 2 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) > > -Peff
