Re: [PATCH 04/36] t/helper: merge test-lazy-init-name-hash into test-tool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 3:53 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h
> @@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ struct index_state {
> -extern int test_lazy_init_name_hash(struct index_state *istate, int try_threaded);
> +extern int lazy_init_name_hash_for_testing(struct index_state *istate, int try_threaded);

I get why you renamed this since the "main" function in the test
program wants to be called 'test_lazy_init_name_hash'...

> diff --git a/t/helper/test-lazy-init-name-hash.c b/t/helper/test-lazy-init-name-hash.c
> @@ -9,6 +10,9 @@ static int perf;
> +static int (*init_name_hash)(struct index_state *istate, int try_threaded) =
> +       lazy_init_name_hash_for_testing;
> +
> @@ -33,9 +37,9 @@ static void dump_run(void)
>         if (single) {
> -               test_lazy_init_name_hash(&the_index, 0);
> +               init_name_hash(&the_index, 0);

... but I'm having trouble understanding why this indirection through
'init_name_hash' is used rather than just calling
lazy_init_name_hash_for_testing() directly. Am I missing something
obvious or is 'init_name_hash' just an unneeded artifact of an earlier
iteration before the rename in cache.{c,h}?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux