On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 03:29:31PM +0100, Lars Schneider wrote: > >> Why isn't this just turning on DEVELOPER=1 if we know we have a capable > >> compiler? > > > > DEVELOPER=1 is always set even before this patch. It's set and > > exported in lib-travisci.sh. > > I interpreted Peff's comment like this: > > If DEVELOPER=1 is set and we detect a gcc-6 in the makefile, > then we could set your additional flags in the makefile. > > This way every developer with a new compiler would run these > flags locally (if DEVELOPER=1 is set). Actually, I was mostly just confused, and didn't realize that these were going above and beyond what's in DEVELOPER. But that said, now that I understand, I agree completely with your suggestion. :) -Peff
