On Tue, Mar 13 2018, Junio C. Hamano jotted: > Martin Ågren <martin.agren@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> +Emacs's own support for Git got better than what was offered by these >>> +modules, or was superseded by popular 3rd-party Git modes such as >>> +Magit. >> >> This somehow reads like "Emacs's own support ... was superseded ...". >> Maybe that's what you mean, but i'm not sure. Perhaps s/, was superseded >> by/. There are also/. > > I think "There are also" is way better. If we really want to sy > superseded, perhaps "The features these modules offered were > superseded by Emacs's own support in VC mode, and popular > third-party Git modes e.g. Magit" is what we can say. I sent a v3 a few days ago which addressed this, it's at 20180310184545.16950-1-avarab@xxxxxxxxx (https://public-inbox.org/git/20180310184545.16950-1-avarab@xxxxxxxxx/) but I see that I screwd up the In-Reply-To (I still don't have this fully automated) so that wasn't part of this thread, sorry. That changes this wording, among other fixes (noted in the tbdiff).
